Mining directors face R10m fine, jail time pollution

Written by  Sheree Bega Thursday, 16 March 2017 16:41
Rate this item
(1 Vote)

The Green Scorpions have hauled three directors of Blyvooruitzicht and Village Main Reef gold mining companies to court for alleged significant pollution and environmental degradation. 

If convicted, the trio, Dalubuhle Ncube, Paul Mariius Saalman and Mark Burrell, could face maximum penalties of up to R10 million in fines and / or a 10 year jail term. 

They appeared in the regional court in Merafong, on the West Rand, on Tuesday following a three year investigation by the Green Scorpions that could set a "game changing" precedent for the responsibilities of mining directors who apply to liquidate mines but "leave polluted sites" in their wake. 

In February 2014 the Federation for a Sustainable Environment (FSE) opened a criminal case against the directors of DRDGold and its operator, Village Main Reef, wit the Carltonville police. 

"The FSE eagerly awaits the judgement which may establish an important, long-awaited and much-needed legal precedent,"said spokesperson Mariette Liefferink. 

"This is regarding the duties, the responsibilities and liabilities of directors of mining companies, who apply for liquidation and wining up but leave n their wake ecologically and geophysically unstable and polluted sites, which impose economic, social and evnironmenral liabilities upon local communities, neighbouring mines, future generations and the State."

The State argues how the Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development Act states the holder of a mining right, or previous owners of an old order right, remains responsible for any environmental liability, pollution, ecological degradation, compliance to the conditions of the environmental authorisation and the management and sustainable closure certificate in terms of this act to the holder or owner concerned.

Blyvoor placed itself under provisional liquidation in June 2011 while Village Main acquired the majority interest in Blyvoor from DRDGold during 2012.

Village Main suspended its financial assistance and Blyvoor was issued with a notice of intention to issue a directive under the National Water Act.

The charges included their alleged failure to clean up the tailings spillages "even after being instructed to do do".  

"The disposal of tailings material into the public domain results in radioactivity doses that exceed both the public dose limit for a single operator (0.25mSv or sievert) per year and from all sources 1mSv per annum for the next 60 years.

"This contaminated soil / tailings material, as a pollution source, exposes current and future generations of the public to unnecessary radiological hazards and may even result in the loss of land use for decades to come.

 “Any person convicted of an offence in terms of this section is liable to a fine not exceeding R10 million or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding 10 years or to both such fine and such imprisonment.”

From June to October 2014, the directors allegedly failed to implement dust management measures “even after being directed to do so and exceeded the dust fall standards".

“A dust fallout concentration of 2776mg/m2/per day was observed with a permissible concentration of less than 600mg/m2/ per day.”

This also carries a R10 million fine, a 10-year jail sentence or both.

The State accuses the trio of not reworking or rehabilitating slimes dams and failure to “manage all environmental impacts in accordance with the approved environmental management programme”.

It also lists the failure to annually assess environmental liability and increase financial provision.

“The accused were instructed to submit strategies to prevent or to minimise environmental impact, clean up tailings and spillages and to indicate measures to prevent recurrence to ensure all reasonable measures to prevent pollution from occurring.

"The accused failed to comply with these.”

It notes how the Department of Mineral Resources estimated the environmental liability to be R142 million based on the revised EMP submitted on December 14, 2012.

“The accused were informed in a letter dated August 2, 2013 that there was a shortfall of  R107 million.

"The accused never provided the said shortfall.”

The other charges include the failure to apply a closure certificate and submit a closure plan as well as the failure to apply for environmental liabilities to be transferred to a competent person.

Kenny Oldwage, an advocate who is representing the Blyvoor directors, could not comment this week.

 

 

 

 

MINING

FSE COMMENTS - Millsite Tailings Storage Facility Reclamation Project

Comments on the Millsite Tailings Storage Facility Reclamation Project: Wetland Sensitivity Mapping and Impact Assessment Freshwater Resource Assessment in the Vicinity of the Proposed Lindum Railway Decommissioning Freshwater Resource Assessment in the Vicinity of the Proposed Millsite Reclamation Surface Water Assessment Report Groundwater Assessment Report Integrated Water Use Licence Application for the Sibanye-Stillwater Rand Uranium/Cooke Operations Integrated Water and Waste Management Plan in support of the WULA   The following comments are submitted on behalf of the Federation for Sustainable Environment (FSE). The FSE is a federation of community based civil society organisations committed to the realisation of the constitutional right to an environment that is not harmful to health or well-being, and to having the environment sustainably managed and protected for future generations. Their mission is specifically focussed on addressing the adverse impacts of mining and industrial activities on the lives and livelihoods of vulnerable and disadvantaged communities who live and work near South Africa’s mines and industries.  

Presentations at the conference "Sustainable Use of Abandoned Mines in the SADC Region"

Presentations, including the FSE’s presentation, held at the conference “Linki...

Palmietkuilen Coal Mining Project Rejected

The Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (GDARD) has refused ...

SA NEWS

Battle to save Marico's river

De Beers has secured rights to prospect for kimberlite in the sensitive catchment of Groot Marico, but residents worry that minim firms could damage their pristine river, writes Sheree Bega

Saturday Star - No holds barred in draft National Master Plan for Water

Saturday Star January 27 2018 No holds barred in draft National Master Plan for Water   Sheree Bega   South Africa’s water scarcity could rapidly get worse as supply contracts and demand escalates due to growth, urbanisation, unsustainable use, degradation of wetlands, water losses and a decline in rainfall because of climate change. This is one of the warnings contained in the new draft National Master Plan for Water and Sanitation. Based on current demand projections, the water deficit confronting the country could be between 2.7 and 3.8 billion cubic metres, a gap of about 17%, by 2030. As of July last year, according to the draft plan, South Africa has consumed more water per capita at about 237 * /c/d than the world average of around 173 * /c/d. To address crippling water shortages, desalinated sea water in coastal areas, and treated waste water, will increasingly be brought into the water mix - together with an increase in the use of groundwater. Desalination plants should “not be implemented as an emergency scheme, only to be used intermittently or during times of drought and inadequate supply from the conventional water resources,” the draft plan cautions. “These schemes are too costly to be moth-balled for any length of time.”

THE IMPACT OF MINING ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN ECONOMY AND LIVING STANDARDS

  POLITICS WEB MINING AND PEOPLE: THE IMPACT OF MINING ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN ECONOMY AND LIVING STANDARDS INTRODUCTION AND SYNOPSIS There are two ways of looking at mining in South Africa. The first is to see it as a sunset industry plagued by rising costs, technical difficulties, and political hostility. The second is to see it as an industry well positioned for a new lease of life despite all the vicissitudes. Even though the attractiveness of South Africa for mining investment has declined, the country still has the world's richest reserves of precious minerals and base metals. Companies both large and small would like to exploit these. Some are doing so despite the political threats. Even more will do so if the threats can be effectively managed or reduced. According to the Chamber of Mines, investment over the next few years could almost double in the absence of threats.

FSE’s Preliminary Comments on the Minister of Water and Sanitation’s decision to consolidate the 9 Catchment Management Agencies into one Catchment Management Agency.

  (Reg. No. 2007/003002/08) NPO NUMBER 062986-NPO PBO No. (TAX EXEMPT) 930 039 506 Postnet Suite 87 Private Bag X033 RIVONIA 2128   COMMENTS ON THE DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND SANITATION’S DECISION TO IMPLEMENT A SINGLE CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT AGENCY (CMA) TO PERFORM WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT FUNCTION IN THE NINE WATER MANAGEMENT AREAS.  The following comments are submitted on behalf of the Federation for a Sustainable Environment. The Federation for a Sustainable Environment (FSE) is a federation of community based civil society organisations committed to the realisation of the constitutional right to an environment that is not harmful to health or well-being, and to having the environment sustainably managed and protected for future generations. The FSE’s mission is specifically focussed on addressing the adverse impacts of mining and industrial activities on the lives and livelihoods of vulnerable and disadvantaged communities who live and work near South Africa’s mines and industries.  

WATER

SUBMISSION ON THE DWS MASTER PLAN

WRITTEN SUBMISSION ON THE DRAFT 2.6: NATIONAL WATER AND SANITATION MASTER PLAN (NW&SMP)  In this document, the Federation for a Sustainable Environment (“FSE”) submits comments on the National Water and Sanitation Master Plan, draft 2.6 (the “draft plan”).  THE FSE:  The FSE is a federation of community based civil society organisations committed to the realisation of the constitutional right to an environment that is not harmful to health or well-being, and to having the environment sustainably managed and protected for future generations. Their mission is specifically focussed on addressing the adverse impacts of mining and industrial activities on the lives and livelihoods of vulnerable and disadvantaged communities who live and work near South Africa’s mines and industries.    In accordance with the above-mentioned mission, the FSE’s comments are limited to matters pertaining to the mining industry. The FSE’s comments will be substantiated by real examples within the scope of the FSE’s experience and our active participation in a significant number of environmental impacts assessments, environmental management programme reports, water use license applications, environmental authorisations, steering committees, forums, task teams, teams of experts, academic research groups, boards, etc. over a period of 15 (fifteen years).[1] [1] Kindly note that the Legal Resources Centre assisted with this publication.

Coalition defending Mpumalanga water source area

Last week, the coalition of eight civil society and community organisations that...