Mining News

Mintails maintains it can make money from muck

Written by  Friday, 28 March 2014 19:18
Rate this item
(0 votes)

by Charlotte Matthews of Business Day
TACKLING the lethal and unsightly legacy of abandoned gold mines around Krugersdorp is not a task for the faint-hearted. But Australian-listed Mintails believes it can play a major role, at the same time as making money for its shareholders.
It is going to cost a lot of money and require some controversial decision-making to address the complex social and environmental problems on the West Rand that reflect illegal mining, communities encroaching on toxic mine tailings, and poisoned water.


Already Mintails has run up against angry residents in Kagiso, who have accused it of blasting too close to their houses and causing structural damage.
It has also come under fire from an environmental nongovernmental organisation, the Federation for a Sustainable Environment (FSE), which accused it last month of allowing tainted water to leak from its Lancaster Dam.
Mintails denied there had been any leak from the dam.
Mintails bought the Mogale Gold tailings treatment operations out of judicial management in 2006. But it is only since a comprehensive change in management in 2011 that it has adopted a new strategy on mine rehabilitation, chairman Mark Brune says.
He told media on a visit to the company’s operations this week that Mintails has about 100-million tonnes of tailings over a 25,000ha area, hard rock resources as well as two gold-processing plants and a water-treatment plant.
Old gold dumps, like the water that has been welling out of old mine workings since 2002 and spilling on the surface, are tainted with sulphuric acid, uranium and other heavy metals including manganese, as well as iron.
The underground water and rain runoff from the dumps around Krugersdorp are leaking into rivers and streams, while the wind blows the fine sand off the dumps into surrounding settlements.
The government has put a partial solution in place on the West, East and Central Basins of the Witwatersrand, for the Trans Caledon Tunnel Authority (TCTA) to pump and neutralise some of the spillage, but a comprehensive treatment solution would cost billions of rand.
Mr Brune says Mintails is pursuing a "mine closure" strategy to clean up the land and treat acid mine water to a standard suitable for industrial or agricultural use.
It is extracting the gold from the tailings and flattening the land to make it fit for other uses. It is also extracting the gold from disused underground workings and shallow pits. After these operations, it will close off these areas so they are no longer accessible to illegal miners.
All this can be done only if there is an economic case for it, Mr Brune says. It also requires consultation: with communities and farmers, scientists, local district municipalities and government.
Water expert Prof Anthony Turton, who is a consultant to Mintails, questions why taxpayers should have to pay for the gold-mining legacy to be fixed.
"We believe there should be a business case, and we have to reach some consensus on it and move forward. This issue will become more pressing as the other gold mines around Johannesburg reach the end of their lives."

Consultant Prof. Anthony Turton, with the Mintails gold plants and water treatment tanks in the background

Consultant Prof. Anthony Turton, with the Mintails gold plants and water treatment tanks in the background

FSE spokesman Koos Pretorius says the FSE fully agrees with Prof Turton that taxpayers should not have to pay for this cleanup. In some areas, Mintails is rehabilitating, he concedes.
But in other places, it is opening up underground operations and open pits and causing more damage, which it claimed it could not afford to fix because it was not making enough profit.
Mr Pretorius says it is possible that at current gold prices, or using current technology, these areas could not be rehabilitated profitably, in which case they would be better left alone. But it could also be that another company would be better able to do it than Mintails.
Mintails’ share price history shows its strategy may not be appealing to a wider investor market, although it may also reflect weak sentiment towards gold mining companies.
Mintails shares have dropped from A$0.50 five years ago to A$0.054 this week. But shareholders are supportive: the company’s recent offer of shares was 73.5% subscribed for, enabling it to raise A$6.25m before costs.
Mr Brune says the traditional mining model, where mining companies did the minimum and kept their heads below the parapet, did not work in this environment.
"We had to reinvent the model," he says. "Our shareholders understand the need for a social licence to operate."
In the short term, Mintails’ profit is suffering from a lower gold price and a drop in production.
The company’s report for the six months to December shows output slipped to 18,354oz of gold from 20,442oz in the corresponding period in 2012 as the average received gold price fell to $1,299.10/oz from $1,684.80.

MINING

FSE COMMENTS - Millsite Tailings Storage Facility Reclamation Project

Comments on the Millsite Tailings Storage Facility Reclamation Project: Wetland Sensitivity Mapping and Impact Assessment Freshwater Resource Assessment in the Vicinity of the Proposed Lindum Railway Decommissioning Freshwater Resource Assessment in the Vicinity of the Proposed Millsite Reclamation Surface Water Assessment Report Groundwater Assessment Report Integrated Water Use Licence Application for the Sibanye-Stillwater Rand Uranium/Cooke Operations Integrated Water and Waste Management Plan in support of the WULA   The following comments are submitted on behalf of the Federation for Sustainable Environment (FSE). The FSE is a federation of community based civil society organisations committed to the realisation of the constitutional right to an environment that is not harmful to health or well-being, and to having the environment sustainably managed and protected for future generations. Their mission is specifically focussed on addressing the adverse impacts of mining and industrial activities on the lives and livelihoods of vulnerable and disadvantaged communities who live and work near South Africa’s mines and industries.  

Presentations at the conference "Sustainable Use of Abandoned Mines in the SADC Region"

Presentations, including the FSE’s presentation, held at the conference “Linki...

Palmietkuilen Coal Mining Project Rejected

The Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (GDARD) has refused ...

SA NEWS

Battle to save Marico's river

De Beers has secured rights to prospect for kimberlite in the sensitive catchment of Groot Marico, but residents worry that minim firms could damage their pristine river, writes Sheree Bega

Saturday Star - No holds barred in draft National Master Plan for Water

Saturday Star January 27 2018 No holds barred in draft National Master Plan for Water   Sheree Bega   South Africa’s water scarcity could rapidly get worse as supply contracts and demand escalates due to growth, urbanisation, unsustainable use, degradation of wetlands, water losses and a decline in rainfall because of climate change. This is one of the warnings contained in the new draft National Master Plan for Water and Sanitation. Based on current demand projections, the water deficit confronting the country could be between 2.7 and 3.8 billion cubic metres, a gap of about 17%, by 2030. As of July last year, according to the draft plan, South Africa has consumed more water per capita at about 237 * /c/d than the world average of around 173 * /c/d. To address crippling water shortages, desalinated sea water in coastal areas, and treated waste water, will increasingly be brought into the water mix - together with an increase in the use of groundwater. Desalination plants should “not be implemented as an emergency scheme, only to be used intermittently or during times of drought and inadequate supply from the conventional water resources,” the draft plan cautions. “These schemes are too costly to be moth-balled for any length of time.”

THE IMPACT OF MINING ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN ECONOMY AND LIVING STANDARDS

  POLITICS WEB MINING AND PEOPLE: THE IMPACT OF MINING ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN ECONOMY AND LIVING STANDARDS INTRODUCTION AND SYNOPSIS There are two ways of looking at mining in South Africa. The first is to see it as a sunset industry plagued by rising costs, technical difficulties, and political hostility. The second is to see it as an industry well positioned for a new lease of life despite all the vicissitudes. Even though the attractiveness of South Africa for mining investment has declined, the country still has the world's richest reserves of precious minerals and base metals. Companies both large and small would like to exploit these. Some are doing so despite the political threats. Even more will do so if the threats can be effectively managed or reduced. According to the Chamber of Mines, investment over the next few years could almost double in the absence of threats.

FSE’s Preliminary Comments on the Minister of Water and Sanitation’s decision to consolidate the 9 Catchment Management Agencies into one Catchment Management Agency.

  (Reg. No. 2007/003002/08) NPO NUMBER 062986-NPO PBO No. (TAX EXEMPT) 930 039 506 Postnet Suite 87 Private Bag X033 RIVONIA 2128   COMMENTS ON THE DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND SANITATION’S DECISION TO IMPLEMENT A SINGLE CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT AGENCY (CMA) TO PERFORM WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT FUNCTION IN THE NINE WATER MANAGEMENT AREAS.  The following comments are submitted on behalf of the Federation for a Sustainable Environment. The Federation for a Sustainable Environment (FSE) is a federation of community based civil society organisations committed to the realisation of the constitutional right to an environment that is not harmful to health or well-being, and to having the environment sustainably managed and protected for future generations. The FSE’s mission is specifically focussed on addressing the adverse impacts of mining and industrial activities on the lives and livelihoods of vulnerable and disadvantaged communities who live and work near South Africa’s mines and industries.  

WATER

SUBMISSION ON THE DWS MASTER PLAN

WRITTEN SUBMISSION ON THE DRAFT 2.6: NATIONAL WATER AND SANITATION MASTER PLAN (NW&SMP)  In this document, the Federation for a Sustainable Environment (“FSE”) submits comments on the National Water and Sanitation Master Plan, draft 2.6 (the “draft plan”).  THE FSE:  The FSE is a federation of community based civil society organisations committed to the realisation of the constitutional right to an environment that is not harmful to health or well-being, and to having the environment sustainably managed and protected for future generations. Their mission is specifically focussed on addressing the adverse impacts of mining and industrial activities on the lives and livelihoods of vulnerable and disadvantaged communities who live and work near South Africa’s mines and industries.    In accordance with the above-mentioned mission, the FSE’s comments are limited to matters pertaining to the mining industry. The FSE’s comments will be substantiated by real examples within the scope of the FSE’s experience and our active participation in a significant number of environmental impacts assessments, environmental management programme reports, water use license applications, environmental authorisations, steering committees, forums, task teams, teams of experts, academic research groups, boards, etc. over a period of 15 (fifteen years).[1] [1] Kindly note that the Legal Resources Centre assisted with this publication.

Coalition defending Mpumalanga water source area

Last week, the coalition of eight civil society and community organisations that...