Mining News

Spectre of Marikana as 'war' erupts at Blyvoor

Written by  Bobby Jordan Wednesday, 16 September 2015 04:03
Rate this item
(0 votes)

A standoff between guards and illegal miners at one of South Africa's biggest gold mines this week erupted in a mini war, prompting fears of another Marikana.

Booby Jordan reports for Sunday Times


Security guards patrolling Blyvooruitzicht mine outside Carletonville on the far West Rand came under fire from an army of more than 100 illegal miners - some of whom shot at them from inside the mine's main staff village.
It is the latest in string of worrying incidents at the liquidated mine home to 10 000 people who live among radioactive slime dams, and mine water and a wasteland of shattered mine buildings.
The Sunday Times visited the once world-famous mine, this week, under armed escort, just hours after a massive gun battle there.
Groups of illegal miners were still hard at work, but scattered when guards fired over their heads, abandoning makeshift outdoor gravel pits.
At one site, miners left a pile hard hats next to a series of Jamison tables – sloping earth tables where gold-bearing gravel is sifted. At another site, pans into a large poll next to the mine’s vandalised sewage treatment plant – now used to sift gravel, particularly late at night.
A fire still burnt where miners had tried to crack the concrete around a large metal pipe, and one man’s meagre packed lunch of two apples bore testimony to the desperation that has turned Blyvoor from a global success story into a humanitarian disaster.
The government has turned its back on the problem, reluctant to intervene and refusing to release information about Mine Closure Trust Funds.
The Merafong municipality can no longer afford to keep the water and electricity going, and the liquidators have appealed for outside help.
A tour of the site established that:
• Mine security has resorted to using a drone to monitor illegal miners, who throw rocks at it;
• The gaping entrance to a mine shaft more than 1 km deep sits at the centre of the property, stripped of all metal protection;
• The cost of rehabilitating the mine has rocketed to more than R100 million, but there is only R36 million set aside for this in the mine closure trust fund; and
• Acid mine water pollution is affected livestock. A study found cattle grazing near an affected dam had a uranium concentration in their kidneys 4 000 times higher than normal.
Having produced more than 1 000 tons of gold, silver, uranium and other minerals in almost 80 years, the mine closed when Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining Company – largely owned by DRDGold went into liquidation two years ago.
It comes with a liability of close to R1-billion, according to court documents.
But while men in suits are running away, illegal miners in threadbare overalls are flooding in.
Louis Nel, a private contractor in charge of mine security, said some miners were armed with assault rifles. He said a shootout on Monday night was the stuff of Hollywood.
“We chased them and they ran into the bushes. Then we had a gunfight. They even started shooting out of some of the mine houses.
“I don’t think this is going to end. The squatter camps here are not going to disappear”, Nel said.
“Blyvoor should be a lesson, but it doesn’t seem anybody wants to learn.”
Sikeme Lekhooana, chairman of the Blyvooruitzicht community committee, said: “We are used to gunshots. My five-year-old boy knows about gunshots”. He also, said Lekhooana, knew about raw sewage in the streets, a daily part of life there.
The Department of Mineral Resources did not respond to queries. The two companies at the centre of the drama, DRD Gold and Village Main Reef, distanced themselves from the mine.
DRDGold entered into a sale agreement with Village Main Reef after the mine applied for business rescue in 2011.
However, as Village Main CEO Marius Saaiman told the Sunday Times: Village is not, and has never been, the owner of Blyvoor. The acquisition of the asset was never concluded and ministerial approval was never granted.”
DRDGold CEO Niel Pretorius said government administrative delays in issuing new-order mineral rights had exacerbated the problem. “Blyvoor is cerntainly an example of how a mine, despite being comprehensively capitalised (R400 million by DRDGold and R160million by Village Main Reef) can collapse if production is interrupted or compromised.

‘Pass the parcel’ flaw in legislation blamed

Bobby Jordan

The humanitarian crisis at the Blyvooruitzicht mine has cast a spotlight on mining legislation, which experts say allows mining companies to walk away from problem mines.
Blyvooruitzicht whistleblower Mariette Liefferink, who has campaigned for mine owners to be held accountable for environmental damage, said the mine illustrated everything that was wrong with the local mining industry.
“It is a human rights violation par excellence and an ecological disaster”, she said. “It shows the consequences of a mine that is not properly closed.”
Catherine Horsfield, programme head of mining at the Centre for Environmental Rights, said it was difficult to understand why DRDGold was not held accountable for the situation.
There was a South African trend for large mining companies to “pull out most of the resource and then sell their mining rights to lesser-known, less-established mining companies”, she said.
“And because the Department of Mineral Resources does not require public participation in these transfers, those transfers fly under the radar. These smaller companies then pull out what is left of the reserve and cannot afford to clean up and so go insolent or disappear.”
The shambles was highlighted in a recent academic study by Tracy Humby, of the Wits School of Law. Humby said loopholes in legislation pertaining to mining and liquidations allowed mining companies to hand over responsibility for mine closure to other companies.
This “pass the parcel” approach to custodianship of the closure plan, whereby the “gift” ended up in the hands of the weakest, undermined the value and integrity of the planning approach to mine closures, Humby said in her article.

MINING

FSE COMMENTS - Millsite Tailings Storage Facility Reclamation Project

Comments on the Millsite Tailings Storage Facility Reclamation Project: Wetland Sensitivity Mapping and Impact Assessment Freshwater Resource Assessment in the Vicinity of the Proposed Lindum Railway Decommissioning Freshwater Resource Assessment in the Vicinity of the Proposed Millsite Reclamation Surface Water Assessment Report Groundwater Assessment Report Integrated Water Use Licence Application for the Sibanye-Stillwater Rand Uranium/Cooke Operations Integrated Water and Waste Management Plan in support of the WULA   The following comments are submitted on behalf of the Federation for Sustainable Environment (FSE). The FSE is a federation of community based civil society organisations committed to the realisation of the constitutional right to an environment that is not harmful to health or well-being, and to having the environment sustainably managed and protected for future generations. Their mission is specifically focussed on addressing the adverse impacts of mining and industrial activities on the lives and livelihoods of vulnerable and disadvantaged communities who live and work near South Africa’s mines and industries.  

Presentations at the conference "Sustainable Use of Abandoned Mines in the SADC Region"

Presentations, including the FSE’s presentation, held at the conference “Linki...

Palmietkuilen Coal Mining Project Rejected

The Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (GDARD) has refused ...

SA NEWS

Battle to save Marico's river

De Beers has secured rights to prospect for kimberlite in the sensitive catchment of Groot Marico, but residents worry that minim firms could damage their pristine river, writes Sheree Bega

Saturday Star - No holds barred in draft National Master Plan for Water

Saturday Star January 27 2018 No holds barred in draft National Master Plan for Water   Sheree Bega   South Africa’s water scarcity could rapidly get worse as supply contracts and demand escalates due to growth, urbanisation, unsustainable use, degradation of wetlands, water losses and a decline in rainfall because of climate change. This is one of the warnings contained in the new draft National Master Plan for Water and Sanitation. Based on current demand projections, the water deficit confronting the country could be between 2.7 and 3.8 billion cubic metres, a gap of about 17%, by 2030. As of July last year, according to the draft plan, South Africa has consumed more water per capita at about 237 * /c/d than the world average of around 173 * /c/d. To address crippling water shortages, desalinated sea water in coastal areas, and treated waste water, will increasingly be brought into the water mix - together with an increase in the use of groundwater. Desalination plants should “not be implemented as an emergency scheme, only to be used intermittently or during times of drought and inadequate supply from the conventional water resources,” the draft plan cautions. “These schemes are too costly to be moth-balled for any length of time.”

THE IMPACT OF MINING ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN ECONOMY AND LIVING STANDARDS

  POLITICS WEB MINING AND PEOPLE: THE IMPACT OF MINING ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN ECONOMY AND LIVING STANDARDS INTRODUCTION AND SYNOPSIS There are two ways of looking at mining in South Africa. The first is to see it as a sunset industry plagued by rising costs, technical difficulties, and political hostility. The second is to see it as an industry well positioned for a new lease of life despite all the vicissitudes. Even though the attractiveness of South Africa for mining investment has declined, the country still has the world's richest reserves of precious minerals and base metals. Companies both large and small would like to exploit these. Some are doing so despite the political threats. Even more will do so if the threats can be effectively managed or reduced. According to the Chamber of Mines, investment over the next few years could almost double in the absence of threats.

FSE’s Preliminary Comments on the Minister of Water and Sanitation’s decision to consolidate the 9 Catchment Management Agencies into one Catchment Management Agency.

  (Reg. No. 2007/003002/08) NPO NUMBER 062986-NPO PBO No. (TAX EXEMPT) 930 039 506 Postnet Suite 87 Private Bag X033 RIVONIA 2128   COMMENTS ON THE DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND SANITATION’S DECISION TO IMPLEMENT A SINGLE CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT AGENCY (CMA) TO PERFORM WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT FUNCTION IN THE NINE WATER MANAGEMENT AREAS.  The following comments are submitted on behalf of the Federation for a Sustainable Environment. The Federation for a Sustainable Environment (FSE) is a federation of community based civil society organisations committed to the realisation of the constitutional right to an environment that is not harmful to health or well-being, and to having the environment sustainably managed and protected for future generations. The FSE’s mission is specifically focussed on addressing the adverse impacts of mining and industrial activities on the lives and livelihoods of vulnerable and disadvantaged communities who live and work near South Africa’s mines and industries.  

WATER

SUBMISSION ON THE DWS MASTER PLAN

WRITTEN SUBMISSION ON THE DRAFT 2.6: NATIONAL WATER AND SANITATION MASTER PLAN (NW&SMP)  In this document, the Federation for a Sustainable Environment (“FSE”) submits comments on the National Water and Sanitation Master Plan, draft 2.6 (the “draft plan”).  THE FSE:  The FSE is a federation of community based civil society organisations committed to the realisation of the constitutional right to an environment that is not harmful to health or well-being, and to having the environment sustainably managed and protected for future generations. Their mission is specifically focussed on addressing the adverse impacts of mining and industrial activities on the lives and livelihoods of vulnerable and disadvantaged communities who live and work near South Africa’s mines and industries.    In accordance with the above-mentioned mission, the FSE’s comments are limited to matters pertaining to the mining industry. The FSE’s comments will be substantiated by real examples within the scope of the FSE’s experience and our active participation in a significant number of environmental impacts assessments, environmental management programme reports, water use license applications, environmental authorisations, steering committees, forums, task teams, teams of experts, academic research groups, boards, etc. over a period of 15 (fifteen years).[1] [1] Kindly note that the Legal Resources Centre assisted with this publication.

Coalition defending Mpumalanga water source area

Last week, the coalition of eight civil society and community organisations that...