Mining News

Gauteng's mine dumps brimming with radioactive uranium

Written by  Wilma Stassen Tuesday, 20 October 2015 04:05
Rate this item
(0 votes)

Over a million Gauteng residents are exposed daily to high levels of uranium with some areas in the West Rand exceeding that of disaster zones from Chernobyl, site of the 1986 Ukrainian nuclear disaster.


The 400km2 of bright yellow mine dumps scattered around the province are laden with 600,000 tons of the radioactive heavy metal uranium, inadvertently excavated through gold mining processes over the last century.
“Gold and uranium occur in the same geological environment and with gold mining, uranium is often also brought to the surface,” explains Professor Frank Winde, a North-West University geographer. “Uranium is more common than gold and for every 10g of gold excavated, 100g of uranium was also brought to the surface. Mine tailings in the Witwatersrand are estimated to contain around 600,000 tons of uranium.”
Uranium is passed on to humans either through the inhalation of fine dust particles from these tailings and can be blown as far as 20km on a windy day, or when mine water seepage enters rivers.
Uranium occurs naturally in the environment and low levels of exposure can be tolerated by humans, but there are well-documented health risks associated with higher levels. These including kidney damage and disease, neurological problems and cancer. It is also an endocrine disrupter that mimics the hormone, oestrogen, which is particularly harmful to pregnant women as it can cause birth defects and developmental delays in their babies.
1.6 Million people live in informal settlements close to radioactive mine residue areas. The majority of mine residue areas are radioactive because the Witwatersrand gold-bearing ores contain almost ten times the amount of uranium than gold.
.
In order to limit the risk of direct exposure to radioactive material, the South African Chamber of Mines has set the guideline that each tailing dump should have a 500m buffer zone surrounding it where no human settlement is allowed.
But an estimated 1.6 million people live in informal and formal settlements on, or directly next to, tailings. In addition to accidental ingestion through the water or air, some of these communities are also directly exposed to radiation from the high levels of uranium and its byproducts (called daughter products) in the tailings.
“These communities are particularly vulnerable because of chronic malnutrition, a high prevalence of HIV/AIDS and substance abuse,” says Mariette Liefferink of the Federation for a Sustainable Environment, who has advocated for the rehabilitation of mine tailings for many years.
Tudor Shaft is a typical example. The 1,800 of residents of this informal settlement directly next to mine tailings in Mogale City in Johannesburg’s West Rand are exposed daily to levels of radiation similar to communities affected by the Chernobyl disaster.
Milli Sievert per annum (mSv/a) measures the dose of radiation on the human body. Safe ranges are below 1mSv/a, but levels between eight and 15mSv/a have been measured at Tudor Shaft. The total direct exposure arising from the Chernobyl disaster for those living in the contaminated areas was 9mSv.
“These communities largely consist of children that play and live on the contaminated soil. Communities also grow their own crops such as mealies and pumpkins in areas that are impacted by mining waste, and marijuana is also grown in these areas,” says Liefferink.


Contamination

However, a few weeks back, Mogale City mayor Koketso Seerane announced at a public meeting that government has set aside R32 million to relocate the people living at Tudor Shaft to the Leratong Nodal Development, Kagiso Extension 13, Chief Mogale Phase 2 and other developments around the city.
But due to the small size of dust particles from the mine tailings, particle matter can also be transported over relatively long distances to agricultural land in surrounding areas.
“The deposition of radioactively contaminated dust on leaves of vegetable and forage plants can cause radiation exposures exceeding those from the inhalation of contaminated dust,” reads a 2007 report by the National Nuclear Regulator (NNR) on the Wonderfonteinspruit Catchment Area (WCA) that includes the town of Randfontein to the west of Johannesburg.
High levels of radioactivity are also found in water sources near some mine tailings. Levels of up to 100mSv/a have been recorded in the WCA.
“The radioactive contamination of surface water bodies in the Wonderonteinspruit catchment area caused by mine water discharge and diffuse emission of seepage and runoff from slime dams poses radiological risks to the public,” reads the NNR report.
Although people do not drink the contaminated water, they consume animal products such as milk and meat from livestock drinking the water or foraging on plants grown in contaminated soil.
“The uranium concentration in the cattle samples from the experimental group (in the Wonderfonteinspruit catchment areas) was 126.7 times higher in the liver, 4350 times higher in the kidney, 47.75 times higher in the spleen, 31.6 times higher in the muscle tissue, 60 times higher in the bone and 129 times higher in the hair than that of the cattle samples from the control group,” says a 2012 North-West University report by David Hamman.
Some traditional and religious practices also lead to direct exposure. Religious groups have been known to baptize devotees in the seepage from mine dams, while “mud cakes” made from tailings are sold by traditional healers, says Liefferink.

Cancer Threat

Uranium can harm humans in three ways: through its chemical toxicity, radiation and other uranium by-products.
Uranium's chemical toxicity is thought to pose a bigger threat to human health than its radioactivity and has a well-established link to kidney disease. High intake can lead to acute kidney inflammation failure, as well as respiratory and neurological problems.
Radiation can cause structural damage to DNA tissue, giving way to cancer. Although external radiation from uranium is not considered dangerous, uranium can cause considerable damage when ingested or inhaled.
"When uranium is ingested and deposited in organs such as kidneys, lungs, brains and bone marrow, energy-rich alpha particles can directly affect surrounding tissue," explains Winde.
An airborne radiometric survey of the West Rand and Far West Rand was done for the Department of Water and Forestry by the Council of Geoscience. Interpretation of the data show many of the residential areas fall within areas of high risk of radioactivity contamination. Ref. Department of Minerals and Energy. Regional Mine Closure Strategy for the West Rand goldfield. 2008
An airborne radiometric survey of the West Rand and Far West Rand was done for the Department of Water and Forestry by the Council of Geoscience. Interpretation of the data show many of the residential areas fall within areas of high risk of radioactivity contamination. Ref. Department of Minerals and Energy. Regional Mine Closure Strategy for the West Rand goldfield. 2008
Uranium poses another danger from the emission of radon (an odourless, colourless radioactive gas produced by decaying uranium), which is also known to cause cancer.
"Radon is a devil," says Dr Carl Albrecht, CANSA's former head of research. "It is volatile and can be breathed in where it can greatly facilitate lung cancer."
"Cancers of all kinds can result from internal radiation exposure [from uranium ingestion],” Prof Serine Shawky wrote in a 2002 article published in the Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. “The bone is one of the main places where depleted uranium is stored, leading to uncontrolled production of white blood cells to the detriment of other cells, ultimately leading to leukemia."

Exposure to radiation can also affect the reproductive system, causing infertility or damage to the father's sperm or the mother's egg.

"It takes many years for a cancer caused by contaminated air, food or water to grow, so the effect is not apparent immediately," said Shaw.

Most of the dumps leaking uranium have been abandoned and the “owners” are either unknown, or unable to rehabilitate areas. Tailings, particularly those close to communities, cannot simply be removed or re-mined as unearthing the soil would release dust laden with uranium and other poisonous chemicals.

Short-term solutions include rehabilitating mine dumps with vegetation in order to prevent loose soil from being blown or washed off by wind or water, and relocating communities living in affected areas. Despite numerous attempts, the Department of Mineral Resources did not respond to requests for comment. – By Wilma Stassen on October 15, 2015 in Environmental Health, Health-e News.

MINING

FSE COMMENTS - Millsite Tailings Storage Facility Reclamation Project

Comments on the Millsite Tailings Storage Facility Reclamation Project: Wetland Sensitivity Mapping and Impact Assessment Freshwater Resource Assessment in the Vicinity of the Proposed Lindum Railway Decommissioning Freshwater Resource Assessment in the Vicinity of the Proposed Millsite Reclamation Surface Water Assessment Report Groundwater Assessment Report Integrated Water Use Licence Application for the Sibanye-Stillwater Rand Uranium/Cooke Operations Integrated Water and Waste Management Plan in support of the WULA   The following comments are submitted on behalf of the Federation for Sustainable Environment (FSE). The FSE is a federation of community based civil society organisations committed to the realisation of the constitutional right to an environment that is not harmful to health or well-being, and to having the environment sustainably managed and protected for future generations. Their mission is specifically focussed on addressing the adverse impacts of mining and industrial activities on the lives and livelihoods of vulnerable and disadvantaged communities who live and work near South Africa’s mines and industries.  

Presentations at the conference "Sustainable Use of Abandoned Mines in the SADC Region"

Presentations, including the FSE’s presentation, held at the conference “Linki...

Palmietkuilen Coal Mining Project Rejected

The Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (GDARD) has refused ...

SA NEWS

Battle to save Marico's river

De Beers has secured rights to prospect for kimberlite in the sensitive catchment of Groot Marico, but residents worry that minim firms could damage their pristine river, writes Sheree Bega

Saturday Star - No holds barred in draft National Master Plan for Water

Saturday Star January 27 2018 No holds barred in draft National Master Plan for Water   Sheree Bega   South Africa’s water scarcity could rapidly get worse as supply contracts and demand escalates due to growth, urbanisation, unsustainable use, degradation of wetlands, water losses and a decline in rainfall because of climate change. This is one of the warnings contained in the new draft National Master Plan for Water and Sanitation. Based on current demand projections, the water deficit confronting the country could be between 2.7 and 3.8 billion cubic metres, a gap of about 17%, by 2030. As of July last year, according to the draft plan, South Africa has consumed more water per capita at about 237 * /c/d than the world average of around 173 * /c/d. To address crippling water shortages, desalinated sea water in coastal areas, and treated waste water, will increasingly be brought into the water mix - together with an increase in the use of groundwater. Desalination plants should “not be implemented as an emergency scheme, only to be used intermittently or during times of drought and inadequate supply from the conventional water resources,” the draft plan cautions. “These schemes are too costly to be moth-balled for any length of time.”

THE IMPACT OF MINING ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN ECONOMY AND LIVING STANDARDS

  POLITICS WEB MINING AND PEOPLE: THE IMPACT OF MINING ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN ECONOMY AND LIVING STANDARDS INTRODUCTION AND SYNOPSIS There are two ways of looking at mining in South Africa. The first is to see it as a sunset industry plagued by rising costs, technical difficulties, and political hostility. The second is to see it as an industry well positioned for a new lease of life despite all the vicissitudes. Even though the attractiveness of South Africa for mining investment has declined, the country still has the world's richest reserves of precious minerals and base metals. Companies both large and small would like to exploit these. Some are doing so despite the political threats. Even more will do so if the threats can be effectively managed or reduced. According to the Chamber of Mines, investment over the next few years could almost double in the absence of threats.

FSE’s Preliminary Comments on the Minister of Water and Sanitation’s decision to consolidate the 9 Catchment Management Agencies into one Catchment Management Agency.

  (Reg. No. 2007/003002/08) NPO NUMBER 062986-NPO PBO No. (TAX EXEMPT) 930 039 506 Postnet Suite 87 Private Bag X033 RIVONIA 2128   COMMENTS ON THE DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND SANITATION’S DECISION TO IMPLEMENT A SINGLE CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT AGENCY (CMA) TO PERFORM WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT FUNCTION IN THE NINE WATER MANAGEMENT AREAS.  The following comments are submitted on behalf of the Federation for a Sustainable Environment. The Federation for a Sustainable Environment (FSE) is a federation of community based civil society organisations committed to the realisation of the constitutional right to an environment that is not harmful to health or well-being, and to having the environment sustainably managed and protected for future generations. The FSE’s mission is specifically focussed on addressing the adverse impacts of mining and industrial activities on the lives and livelihoods of vulnerable and disadvantaged communities who live and work near South Africa’s mines and industries.  

WATER

SUBMISSION ON THE DWS MASTER PLAN

WRITTEN SUBMISSION ON THE DRAFT 2.6: NATIONAL WATER AND SANITATION MASTER PLAN (NW&SMP)  In this document, the Federation for a Sustainable Environment (“FSE”) submits comments on the National Water and Sanitation Master Plan, draft 2.6 (the “draft plan”).  THE FSE:  The FSE is a federation of community based civil society organisations committed to the realisation of the constitutional right to an environment that is not harmful to health or well-being, and to having the environment sustainably managed and protected for future generations. Their mission is specifically focussed on addressing the adverse impacts of mining and industrial activities on the lives and livelihoods of vulnerable and disadvantaged communities who live and work near South Africa’s mines and industries.    In accordance with the above-mentioned mission, the FSE’s comments are limited to matters pertaining to the mining industry. The FSE’s comments will be substantiated by real examples within the scope of the FSE’s experience and our active participation in a significant number of environmental impacts assessments, environmental management programme reports, water use license applications, environmental authorisations, steering committees, forums, task teams, teams of experts, academic research groups, boards, etc. over a period of 15 (fifteen years).[1] [1] Kindly note that the Legal Resources Centre assisted with this publication.

Coalition defending Mpumalanga water source area

Last week, the coalition of eight civil society and community organisations that...