Comments

Reclamation of the Soweto Cluster mine dumps

Written by  Monday, 25 August 2014 05:51
Rate this item
(0 votes)

DRD Gold's organizational structure is such that it is divided into dozens of sub-companies, with each sub-company being responsible for its own production and maximizing its own profit. It is structured in such a manner that the profits of one sub-company cannot offset the liabilities and impacts of another sub-company.  The result is that the impacts and the pollution costs of beleaguered sub-companies are often carried by communities, the environment and future generations and not by DRD Gold.

The Federation for a Sustainable Environment comments on the reclaimation of the Soweto Cluster mine dumps.  This in response to the enviornmental impact assessment and environmental management programme for same.   The full comment is available as a PDF attachment. Extracts from the comment follow.


The Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mine Company (BGMC) eft in its wake a number of un-rehabilitated footprints of reclaimed tailings storage facilities, containing toxic and radioactive water and soil, radioactive infrastructure, tailings storage facilities without vegetation, retainer walls and functional toe paddocks and penstocks, and total environmental liabilities of R891 million. R35 million is held in trust for rehabilitation.
A criminal case was opened against the directors of DRD Gold and itsoperator, Village Main Reef Mine (VMRM) by the FSE at the Carletonville Police Station on the 19th of February 2014 (CAS 347/2/2014) for the alleged violations of the Environmental Management Programme Report, including the Slime Spill Contingency Plan and the Blyvoor Waste Management Strategy.
Pursuant to the criminal charge, the DEA: Inspectorate in collaboration with the Department of Mineral Resources (DMR), the NNR, the DWA, provincial and local municipalities has launched a criminal investigation against DRD Gold and Village Main Reef Mine.
It is common practice for DRD Gold to transfer the assets and significant liabilities of its less profitable sub-companies to beleaguered mining companies.  
The aforesaid is relevant to the proposed reclamation of the Soweto Cluster Mine Dumps as follows:
The name of the applicant is listed as Ergo Mining (Pty) Ltd. (Ergo).  Ergo is a subsidiary of DRD Gold.  The FSE expresses serious concern that when DRD Gold’s subsidiary has selectively extracted the value from the portions of the slimes dams and sand dumps (Ergo has applied for a mining right in respect of twelve slimes dams and two sand dumps), there is the risk that Ergo will either apply for liquidation or will alienate its liabilities to companies that do not have access to sufficient financial resources or whose mining activities will result in unacceptable pollution, ecological degradation or damage to the environment.  

Also -
The current state of the environment suggests a gross failure on the part of DRD Gold in

  • Its duty of care (Section 28 of the National Environmental Management Act, 107 of 1998
  • To prevent pollution
  • To responsibly manage its significant impacts
  • To comply with its legally binding Environmental Management Programmes and Plans.

The highest burden of the pollution costs are currently being borne by communities and the environment and not by DRD Gold as would be expected.


The FSE further comments -

This application should only be approved if it involves the removal of the entire residue deposits of the twelve slimes dams and two sand dumps and the rehabilitation of the remaining footprints.   
The past practice of granting rights and authorization for the reprocessing of individual residue deposits must be reviewed insofar as it allows the selective extraction of value from portions of a site without ploughing some of that value back into the rehabilitation of the entire mining area.  It must be accepted that the reprocessing of some mining residues will never be economically viable and that these will need to be transported to superdumps, or rehabilitated in situ.
While the EIA/EMPR Report commits to the testing of radioactivity, the failure to assess the radioactivity and toxicity risks and the potential for acute and latent toxicity and radioactivity impacts on humans presents a flaw in the Report.
The proposed post closure monitoring of the dump footprints for 3 years (page 59 of the EIA/EMP Report) is regarded as insufficient.  The latent impacts may continue for decades.

The FSE urges the decision-makers not to grant the mining right and environmental authorisation for the above-mentioned project unless the future land uses, in consultation with interested and affected parties, have been determined and assiduous attention has been given expert findings. These include that experts consider residential townships, edible crop production and livestock grazing to be high risk land-uses for tailings storage facilities footprints and areas within the aqueous and aerial zone of influence.  Failure by the regulators and communities to agree on suitable ‘soft’ end land-uses and buffer zones could exacerbate liabilities for closing mines by resulting in subsequent land-uses that are sub-economic or risky.

We also think it relevant to advise that since the MPRDA commits to the NEMA principles, this implies that the Best Available Technology not Exceeding Excess Cost (BATNEEC) approach can no longer be followed in determining the “reasonable measures” for remediation and mine closure, since the National Environmental Management Act (107 of 1998) (NEMA) does not refer to BATNEEC, but incorporates the Best Practicable Environmental Option (BPEO) approach in section 2.  NEMA defines “best practicable environmental option” to mean the option that provides the most benefit or causes the least damage to the environment as a whole, at a cost accept able to society in the long as well as the short term.  The BPEO is therefore the outcome of a systematic consultative and decision making process that emphasises the protection of the environment across land, air and water and that establishes, for a given set of objectives, the option that provides the most benefit or least damage to the environment as a whole at acceptable cost in the short as well as long term.

Furthermore, the study area occurs within two threatened ecosystems, the Klip River Highveld Grassland and the Soweto Highveld Grassland and the pipeline routes will cross these areas. (Page 25 of the EIA/EMP Report.)  Since the EIA was conducted during April, the EIA would significantly under-represent the the evaluation of the biodiversity within the Grassland Biome and most plant species (83% of which are actually non-grasses).

MINING

FSE COMMENTS - Millsite Tailings Storage Facility Reclamation Project

Comments on the Millsite Tailings Storage Facility Reclamation Project: Wetland Sensitivity Mapping and Impact Assessment Freshwater Resource Assessment in the Vicinity of the Proposed Lindum Railway Decommissioning Freshwater Resource Assessment in the Vicinity of the Proposed Millsite Reclamation Surface Water Assessment Report Groundwater Assessment Report Integrated Water Use Licence Application for the Sibanye-Stillwater Rand Uranium/Cooke Operations Integrated Water and Waste Management Plan in support of the WULA   The following comments are submitted on behalf of the Federation for Sustainable Environment (FSE). The FSE is a federation of community based civil society organisations committed to the realisation of the constitutional right to an environment that is not harmful to health or well-being, and to having the environment sustainably managed and protected for future generations. Their mission is specifically focussed on addressing the adverse impacts of mining and industrial activities on the lives and livelihoods of vulnerable and disadvantaged communities who live and work near South Africa’s mines and industries.  

Presentations at the conference "Sustainable Use of Abandoned Mines in the SADC Region"

Presentations, including the FSE’s presentation, held at the conference “Linki...

Palmietkuilen Coal Mining Project Rejected

The Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (GDARD) has refused ...

SA NEWS

Battle to save Marico's river

De Beers has secured rights to prospect for kimberlite in the sensitive catchment of Groot Marico, but residents worry that minim firms could damage their pristine river, writes Sheree Bega

Saturday Star - No holds barred in draft National Master Plan for Water

Saturday Star January 27 2018 No holds barred in draft National Master Plan for Water   Sheree Bega   South Africa’s water scarcity could rapidly get worse as supply contracts and demand escalates due to growth, urbanisation, unsustainable use, degradation of wetlands, water losses and a decline in rainfall because of climate change. This is one of the warnings contained in the new draft National Master Plan for Water and Sanitation. Based on current demand projections, the water deficit confronting the country could be between 2.7 and 3.8 billion cubic metres, a gap of about 17%, by 2030. As of July last year, according to the draft plan, South Africa has consumed more water per capita at about 237 * /c/d than the world average of around 173 * /c/d. To address crippling water shortages, desalinated sea water in coastal areas, and treated waste water, will increasingly be brought into the water mix - together with an increase in the use of groundwater. Desalination plants should “not be implemented as an emergency scheme, only to be used intermittently or during times of drought and inadequate supply from the conventional water resources,” the draft plan cautions. “These schemes are too costly to be moth-balled for any length of time.”

THE IMPACT OF MINING ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN ECONOMY AND LIVING STANDARDS

  POLITICS WEB MINING AND PEOPLE: THE IMPACT OF MINING ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN ECONOMY AND LIVING STANDARDS INTRODUCTION AND SYNOPSIS There are two ways of looking at mining in South Africa. The first is to see it as a sunset industry plagued by rising costs, technical difficulties, and political hostility. The second is to see it as an industry well positioned for a new lease of life despite all the vicissitudes. Even though the attractiveness of South Africa for mining investment has declined, the country still has the world's richest reserves of precious minerals and base metals. Companies both large and small would like to exploit these. Some are doing so despite the political threats. Even more will do so if the threats can be effectively managed or reduced. According to the Chamber of Mines, investment over the next few years could almost double in the absence of threats.

FSE’s Preliminary Comments on the Minister of Water and Sanitation’s decision to consolidate the 9 Catchment Management Agencies into one Catchment Management Agency.

  (Reg. No. 2007/003002/08) NPO NUMBER 062986-NPO PBO No. (TAX EXEMPT) 930 039 506 Postnet Suite 87 Private Bag X033 RIVONIA 2128   COMMENTS ON THE DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND SANITATION’S DECISION TO IMPLEMENT A SINGLE CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT AGENCY (CMA) TO PERFORM WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT FUNCTION IN THE NINE WATER MANAGEMENT AREAS.  The following comments are submitted on behalf of the Federation for a Sustainable Environment. The Federation for a Sustainable Environment (FSE) is a federation of community based civil society organisations committed to the realisation of the constitutional right to an environment that is not harmful to health or well-being, and to having the environment sustainably managed and protected for future generations. The FSE’s mission is specifically focussed on addressing the adverse impacts of mining and industrial activities on the lives and livelihoods of vulnerable and disadvantaged communities who live and work near South Africa’s mines and industries.  

WATER

SUBMISSION ON THE DWS MASTER PLAN

WRITTEN SUBMISSION ON THE DRAFT 2.6: NATIONAL WATER AND SANITATION MASTER PLAN (NW&SMP)  In this document, the Federation for a Sustainable Environment (“FSE”) submits comments on the National Water and Sanitation Master Plan, draft 2.6 (the “draft plan”).  THE FSE:  The FSE is a federation of community based civil society organisations committed to the realisation of the constitutional right to an environment that is not harmful to health or well-being, and to having the environment sustainably managed and protected for future generations. Their mission is specifically focussed on addressing the adverse impacts of mining and industrial activities on the lives and livelihoods of vulnerable and disadvantaged communities who live and work near South Africa’s mines and industries.    In accordance with the above-mentioned mission, the FSE’s comments are limited to matters pertaining to the mining industry. The FSE’s comments will be substantiated by real examples within the scope of the FSE’s experience and our active participation in a significant number of environmental impacts assessments, environmental management programme reports, water use license applications, environmental authorisations, steering committees, forums, task teams, teams of experts, academic research groups, boards, etc. over a period of 15 (fifteen years).[1] [1] Kindly note that the Legal Resources Centre assisted with this publication.

Coalition defending Mpumalanga water source area

Last week, the coalition of eight civil society and community organisations that...