We object for the following reasons:
The EIA/EMP for Sedibelo was approved in 2008 and the EIA/EMP included:
• An open pit and underground mine
• Decline and ventilation shafts,
• A tailings storage facility
• A waste rock dump
• Topsoil stockpiles
• Run-of mine pads
• Explosives magazine,
• Concentrator plant
• Contractors laydown area
• Solid and hazardous waste skips and transfer areas,
• Fuel bays, etc.
The above-mentioned application includes:
• The enlarging of the open pit
• The repositioning/redesigning of the approved surface infrastructure to cater for additional mineralised waste
• Additional infrastructure
• Increase in the capacity of the approved sewage treatment plant
The Executive Summary in terms of the EIA/EMP Report lists the following potential impacts associated with the project:
1. Loss of soil resources and land capability
2. Physical destruction of biodiversity
3. Loss of water resources as an ecological driver
Impacts associated with the loss of water resources as an ecological driver as a result of the mine relates to changes in hydrology, including the potential ecological impact on the groundwater that contributes to sources/systems as well as the endorheic pans – springs and pannetjies within the north western boundary of the Pilanesberg National Park, 7 km south west from the centre of the Sedibelo pit)
4. Contamination of surface water resources
5. Alteration of natural drainage lines
7. Contamination of groundwater
Many communities surrounding the study area rely on groundwater alone for their basic water requirements. There is no surface water storage in the area. Although the villages located on the northern rim of the Pilanesberg National Park are connected to Magalies Water infrastructure they are often without potable water . Villages located further to the north and north west of the study area rely solely on groundwater.
We here interpose: If left unmanaged, the current struggle by the above-mentioned communities to have access to sufficient water – a constitutional right – represents a real potential for conflict. If communities remain without access to potable water and the Applicant continues to divert river systems and modify the water table without consequence, social unrest and protests will escalate.
8. Air pollution
9. Visual impacts
10. Loss of conservation and eco-tourism land use
The significance of the above-mentioned impacts is listed as high. Due to the extensive regional impacts of mining within this area of highest and high biodiversity importance and on the water resources, they may not have the resilience to withstand any further impacts. This means that the proposed mitigation and management measures must be implemented rigorously with no compromise. We express little or no confidence, based on historical evidence, that mitigation measures will be implemented or adequately implemented.
Read the full objection (18 pages) by downloading the document.