Truth of the dust that brings death

Written by  Sheree Bega Thursday, 13 October 2016 15:37
Rate this item
(0 votes)

 

A new hard-hitting report from Harvard Law School details how South Africa has failed to meet its human rights obligations concerning gold mining in and around Joburg. Bonnie Docherty, who led the research, spoke to Sheree Bega

Johannesburg - Great riches and high risks. That’s the story of gold mining on the Witwatersrand, where the sparkle of the gold rush led to a boom that would give rise to Joburg, turning it into one of the most powerful cities on the continent. But the hunt for gold would also irrevocably alter our socio-political and natural landscape.

“Since its earliest days, the industry has endangered the environment and health of people,” explains Docherty, a senior clinical instructor at the international human rights clinic at Harvard Law School. While mining has played an integral part in economic growth for more than a century, it has disempowered communities of the West and Central Rand, which make up a large part of the mining belt, she says.

Docherty is the leading author of The Cost of Gold: Environmental, Health and Human Rights Consequences of Gold Mining in South Africa’s West and Central Rand, which, for the first time, documents the dangerous fallout of water, air and soil pollution from mining “through a human rights lens”.

“I was particularly moved by the experiences of the residents of the Bekkersdal informal settlement. I watched them wash clothes, water livestock and play in water that contained toxic and radioactive contaminants, including uranium. Although such contamination is not visible, it has the potential to cause serious, long-term health effects,” she says.

South Africa has not fully complied with its own constitutional or international law.

“The government has not only inadequately mitigated the harm from abandoned and active mines, but it has also offered scant warnings of the risks,” the report says, “(and) despite some signs of progress, the government’s response to the crisis has been insufficient and unacceptably slow.”

There’s growing momentum to argue the human rights case. Last week, in a joint submission to the UN Human Rights Council, local civil-society organisations wrote to the UN Human Rights Council about how poorly regulated mining and coal-fired power generation are to blame for air and water pollution, destruction of arable land and biodiversity loss.

“Despite the human rights harms of mining and of coal-burning, the government allows excessive pollution to continue,” the civil groups say.

For more than a century, gold mining has released highly toxic contaminants into the environment, raising concerns under several economic, social and cultural rights.

Acid mine drainage (AMD), a toxic by-product, has polluted water bodies that residents use to irrigate crops, water livestock, wash clothes and swim in.

“Community members have indirectly ingested AMD, especially by eating vegetables irrigated with the polluted water, meat from cattle that have drunk from local waterways and fish from contaminated bodies of water. Local people have also been exposed through skin contact that has happened when they have washed clothes or swum in tainted lakes and streams,” the report warns.

“Studies done in other parts of the world have documented long-term health impacts, such as cancer and organ damage, from the same contaminants.”

But although AMD reached the surface of the West Rand in 2002, the government waited 10 years before establishing a plant that could stem its flow. Its short-term treatment plants have fallen short of a complete solution because they have only neutralised water, leaving high concentrations of sulphates that can cause acute health effects and make water unsuitable.

Desalination, “a more thorough treatment process”, is needed, “but its success depends on the government implementing it effectively and in a timely manner”, continues the report.

Too little too has been done to address other major sources of AMD, such as rainwater run-off and underground seepage from mine waste sites. In addition, locals have been unable to escape the health effects posed by Joburg’s more than 200 tailings dams, or “hills of waste”.

“Like AMD, they contain elevated concentrations of heavy metals, including radioactive uranium. Contaminated dust has filled the air and blanketed communities, leading to widespread complaints of asthma and other breathing difficulties.”

Yet the government has left it up to the mining industry to determine how to remove the waste dumps. The location of many settlements “near or on top of the tailings dams” has endangered residents, says Docherty, whose report cites how residents of at least 10 mining communities in the West and Central Rand blame this dust for causing breathing difficulties, chronic coughs and sinusitus.

The state has failed mining communities

The government has a legal obligation to guarantee human rights, yet its delayed response and piecemeal approach falls short of South Africa’s duties under human rights law.

“As a result, the impacts of mining continue to infringe on residents’ rights, as well as those to receive information and participate in decision-making,” Docherty says.

The government, together with the mining industry, has long known of the dangers of AMD. In the landmark 1951 case, Rex v Marshall and Another, the judiciary found criminal liability existed for damage caused by AMD. It has responded to the tailings problem with a “hands-off approach” inconsistent with its human rights obligations, the report states.

“It has relocated residents living on a highly radioactive mine dump (in Tudor Shaft) to safer homes, but it has elsewhere allowed construction of new housing projects near tailings dams, and it has also insufficiently addressed the danger of contaminated dust,” notes the report.

Over the past five years, the state has taken “some noteworthy steps” to address the adverse impacts of gold mining, moving beyond primary reliance on industry, “but it has failed to live up to many relevant human rights obligations”.

While the gold mining industry has changed in scale and technology over the past 130 years and government regulation has increased, mining has continued to damage the environment and endanger local populations.

The remains of abandoned “legacy mines” and new operations, including the remining of old sites, have contaminated the region.

The state's response to the crisis has generally been slow and insufficient, with locals - frequently poor, black communities living in the shadow of mining operations - mostly excluded from decisions.

“The government’s poor record of engaging with residents has been almost as problematic as the adverse effects of mining operations,” adds Docherty.

Mariette Liefferink of the Federation for a Sustainable Environment agrees, pointing out how 1.6 million people continue to live on radioactive mine residue areas in Gauteng.

“We have whistle-blown these alleged human rights violations for more than a decade, noting the systemic failure on the part of the relevant organs of state to protect the human rights of mining-affected communities,” says Liefferink.

What should be done?

South Africa should adopt a programme that both mitigates the effects of mining and helps the country meet its responsibilities under domestic, international and regional human rights law.

“Although mining waste that has accumulated in the past 130 years cannot be eliminated overnight, greater efforts could be made to suppress toxic dust and to remove or buffer communities from contaminated environments,” the report says.

Measures include cleaning up polluted areas, free health screenings, ensuring water treatment plants are adequate to prevent decanting, monitoring degrees of contamination and improving control of run-off and seepage from tailings dams.

“Mitigating the environmental, health and human rights impacts of gold mining in the West and Central Rand will require a significant commitment. The government will need to improve interactions with communities and adopt an overarching plan,” the report says.

THE STAR / 12 October 2016, 2:28pm

 

SHEREE BEGA

MINING

FSE COMMENTS - Millsite Tailings Storage Facility Reclamation Project

Comments on the Millsite Tailings Storage Facility Reclamation Project: Wetland Sensitivity Mapping and Impact Assessment Freshwater Resource Assessment in the Vicinity of the Proposed Lindum Railway Decommissioning Freshwater Resource Assessment in the Vicinity of the Proposed Millsite Reclamation Surface Water Assessment Report Groundwater Assessment Report Integrated Water Use Licence Application for the Sibanye-Stillwater Rand Uranium/Cooke Operations Integrated Water and Waste Management Plan in support of the WULA   The following comments are submitted on behalf of the Federation for Sustainable Environment (FSE). The FSE is a federation of community based civil society organisations committed to the realisation of the constitutional right to an environment that is not harmful to health or well-being, and to having the environment sustainably managed and protected for future generations. Their mission is specifically focussed on addressing the adverse impacts of mining and industrial activities on the lives and livelihoods of vulnerable and disadvantaged communities who live and work near South Africa’s mines and industries.  

Presentations at the conference "Sustainable Use of Abandoned Mines in the SADC Region"

Presentations, including the FSE’s presentation, held at the conference “Linki...

Palmietkuilen Coal Mining Project Rejected

The Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (GDARD) has refused ...

SA NEWS

Battle to save Marico's river

De Beers has secured rights to prospect for kimberlite in the sensitive catchment of Groot Marico, but residents worry that minim firms could damage their pristine river, writes Sheree Bega

Saturday Star - No holds barred in draft National Master Plan for Water

Saturday Star January 27 2018 No holds barred in draft National Master Plan for Water   Sheree Bega   South Africa’s water scarcity could rapidly get worse as supply contracts and demand escalates due to growth, urbanisation, unsustainable use, degradation of wetlands, water losses and a decline in rainfall because of climate change. This is one of the warnings contained in the new draft National Master Plan for Water and Sanitation. Based on current demand projections, the water deficit confronting the country could be between 2.7 and 3.8 billion cubic metres, a gap of about 17%, by 2030. As of July last year, according to the draft plan, South Africa has consumed more water per capita at about 237 * /c/d than the world average of around 173 * /c/d. To address crippling water shortages, desalinated sea water in coastal areas, and treated waste water, will increasingly be brought into the water mix - together with an increase in the use of groundwater. Desalination plants should “not be implemented as an emergency scheme, only to be used intermittently or during times of drought and inadequate supply from the conventional water resources,” the draft plan cautions. “These schemes are too costly to be moth-balled for any length of time.”

THE IMPACT OF MINING ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN ECONOMY AND LIVING STANDARDS

  POLITICS WEB MINING AND PEOPLE: THE IMPACT OF MINING ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN ECONOMY AND LIVING STANDARDS INTRODUCTION AND SYNOPSIS There are two ways of looking at mining in South Africa. The first is to see it as a sunset industry plagued by rising costs, technical difficulties, and political hostility. The second is to see it as an industry well positioned for a new lease of life despite all the vicissitudes. Even though the attractiveness of South Africa for mining investment has declined, the country still has the world's richest reserves of precious minerals and base metals. Companies both large and small would like to exploit these. Some are doing so despite the political threats. Even more will do so if the threats can be effectively managed or reduced. According to the Chamber of Mines, investment over the next few years could almost double in the absence of threats.

FSE’s Preliminary Comments on the Minister of Water and Sanitation’s decision to consolidate the 9 Catchment Management Agencies into one Catchment Management Agency.

  (Reg. No. 2007/003002/08) NPO NUMBER 062986-NPO PBO No. (TAX EXEMPT) 930 039 506 Postnet Suite 87 Private Bag X033 RIVONIA 2128   COMMENTS ON THE DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND SANITATION’S DECISION TO IMPLEMENT A SINGLE CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT AGENCY (CMA) TO PERFORM WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT FUNCTION IN THE NINE WATER MANAGEMENT AREAS.  The following comments are submitted on behalf of the Federation for a Sustainable Environment. The Federation for a Sustainable Environment (FSE) is a federation of community based civil society organisations committed to the realisation of the constitutional right to an environment that is not harmful to health or well-being, and to having the environment sustainably managed and protected for future generations. The FSE’s mission is specifically focussed on addressing the adverse impacts of mining and industrial activities on the lives and livelihoods of vulnerable and disadvantaged communities who live and work near South Africa’s mines and industries.  

WATER

SUBMISSION ON THE DWS MASTER PLAN

WRITTEN SUBMISSION ON THE DRAFT 2.6: NATIONAL WATER AND SANITATION MASTER PLAN (NW&SMP)  In this document, the Federation for a Sustainable Environment (“FSE”) submits comments on the National Water and Sanitation Master Plan, draft 2.6 (the “draft plan”).  THE FSE:  The FSE is a federation of community based civil society organisations committed to the realisation of the constitutional right to an environment that is not harmful to health or well-being, and to having the environment sustainably managed and protected for future generations. Their mission is specifically focussed on addressing the adverse impacts of mining and industrial activities on the lives and livelihoods of vulnerable and disadvantaged communities who live and work near South Africa’s mines and industries.    In accordance with the above-mentioned mission, the FSE’s comments are limited to matters pertaining to the mining industry. The FSE’s comments will be substantiated by real examples within the scope of the FSE’s experience and our active participation in a significant number of environmental impacts assessments, environmental management programme reports, water use license applications, environmental authorisations, steering committees, forums, task teams, teams of experts, academic research groups, boards, etc. over a period of 15 (fifteen years).[1] [1] Kindly note that the Legal Resources Centre assisted with this publication.

Coalition defending Mpumalanga water source area

Last week, the coalition of eight civil society and community organisations that...