Water News

Blyvoor mine joins the Aurora strip club

Written by  Saturday, 16 August 2014 09:07
Rate this item
(2 votes)

The troubled mine has closed, leaving behind a toxic legacy that nobody is prepared to deal with as liquidators try to cover debts before restitution.

The once vibrant mining town of Blyvooruitzicht is being stripped. Its silent mine is stuck in legal limbo as liquidators try to sell it to cover debts. The environmental damage it is causing should be fixable, but any money that could be spent on this is instead being used to pay debts racked up by the mine’s old owners.
The Blyvoor mine was founded a century ago, and a small town soon grew neatly around its rich gold seams. Its name, meaning happy prospect, was born of optimism. In 2012 it was sold by DRD Gold to Village Main Reef, which declared bankruptcy just 13 months later, after losing R88-million in the last quarter.

Workers are now stuck without exit health checks – which would allow them to work elsewhere – and the derelict mine is leaking waste into the surrounding environment.
The 30m cement shaft towers rise sharply from the yellow highveld grass. The tar roads leading from it and around the once neat neighbourhoods of Blyvoor are ruined.
Thick, rusted metal pipes run from the mine to smaller facilities such as crushing plants and water treatment works. On one road a man is kneeling with a blowtorch, surrounded by flames and smoke, cutting apart a pipe. The pipe sections are then carried to a bakkie parked nearby. Blyvoor is being stripped down.

Barred entrance

At the mine’s main buildings, razor wire prevents entry, but it seems to be too late. All the windows in the abandoned mine offices are missing. Doors hang open on their hinges. A guard peers through the locked gate.
His walkie-talkie crackles. Around him are the remains of a derelict security apparatus, with metal scanners and the chipped wooden remnants of dog kennels. Loose corrugated iron sheets flap at the lightest breeze.
“The mine is killing us,” says an angry Paulo de Gouveia, who owns a small shopping centre on the edge of town. The municipal water has stopped in many areas and people are too scared of using the contaminated river water. “The mine and government have just stopped caring about this town.” He has lived here since 1965 and now wants to move elsewhere.
When Village Main Reef declared bankruptcy, the liquidator – Harvard Corporate Recovery Services – said it needed R77-million to pay off workers and settle debts. The only offer came from Goldrich, a company that soon turned out to be owned by the same people who had bought and stripped all of Aurora’s assets.
Stripping started at Blyvoor before the liquidators went to court to evict Goldrich. Now the mine is ownerless and zama zamas – illegal miners – have begun digging for gold. Dozens have been killed.

Good cover

The thick acacia bush around the town provides good cover for their activities. The crunch of tyres on the gravel road sends a man in blue overalls scurrying away, carefully carrying a spade of earth. He keeps glancing over his shoulder.
A kilometre on, similar glances are thrown by a group of five men in blue mine overalls crowded around a stripped building. They vanish into the bush, leaving a small pile of metal at the gaping hole where a door used to be.
The liquidator has said that stopping zama zamas and others stripping the mine is “nearly impossible”, given the sprawling mine premises.
Further down the road a herd of cattle graze on the verge. Some walk through pools of stagnant green sewage, which leaves a crust on their hooves. The herder, Vusi Masha, gives a smile that seems rare in Blyvoor. “Why are you here?” he asks. “People stay away unless they live here.” His worn olive-green jacket is all that remains from his job at the mine’s crushing plant.
“I am lucky my family came here with cattle, because now there is land for them to graze.” They live on the northern side of Blyvoor, in a rapidly growing informal settlement inside a wetland. This is better than their home in Carletonville.
“There is space but the mines leave so many problems.” He points at his skinny Nguni cattle with his patched baseball cap. “The water makes them sick. I heard that this is because the mine has made problems with the water. And the grass has this dust.”


In April the National Nuclear Regulator found high levels of radioactivity around the mine. They inspected the site with the Green Scorpions as part of a criminal investigation into the mine’s environmental negligence. Neither can comment on the process.
They were responding to charges laid by Mariette Liefferink, a founder of the nongovernmental Federation for a Sustainable Environment. She alleged that DRD and Village Main Reef had been committing environmental infractions since 2008. Advances in environmental law mean that the directors of companies can now be found liable for the damage caused by their companies.
When mining stopped, the water pumps inside the mine’s shafts stopped. Threatened by the prospect of the fallout from rapid acid mine drainage flowing towards Potchefstroom in the southwest, neighbouring mines had to take over pumping work.
The dust is the visible problem, thanks to a massive mine dump on the western end of town. The rolling and rocky hills around it blend seamlessly into other dumps. Plants and sprinklers have made these a dull grey. They are not a problem. But the new dump, which rose up when new operations started, is a stark yellow that clashes with the town’s winter palette.
The dust blowing off its half-kilometre-long surface covers everything. Everyone in the town complains about the coughing that comes, thanks to the dust.

Fixer fund

A fund of R37-million exists to fix these problems. When a mine opens the mining and environment laws say it must continually fix problems, and deposit money with the minerals department to close the mine properly. Village Main Reef cannot comment because of the liquidation.
DRD’s spokesperson James Duncan said last year: “There is absolutely no reason why the liquidator cannot draw from the rehabilitation fund to conduct work consistent with the closure plan.”
But a lack of precedent means that this fund is stuck in the liquidation. Catherine Horsfield, an attorney at the Centre for Environmental Rights, says the Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development Act is vague. Business legislation currently gets priority so the R37-million is being used to service debtors. The environment is low on this list, she said.
Earlier this year former mineral affairs minister Susan Shabangu said there was nothing her department could do because Blyvoor had gone into liquidation. For the thousands still left in Blyvoor this means nobody can help them. The hands of each department are tied.
To survive, the residents are stripping the entire town. The only wood left is charred, in buildings that have caught fire. Crowbar marks show where bricks have been pried loose.
“Everything has collapsed. We are not a community,” says Saviour Moloetsi. He will not leave his home for fear of it being burgled. A tall man with large, calloused hands, he has to slide open a thick, black bolt on his door to come outside and talk. Maize grows in his garden. He goes to Carletonville 5km away for water


Notification of the Withdrawal of the Application of an Amendment of the Environmental Authorisation and Environmental Management Programme for the Sweet Sensation Sand Mining Operation in Free State

The concerted efforts and submissions to the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy (DMRE), the Applicant and its appointed Environmental Assessment Practitioner (EAP) by the Protect Vaal Eden Committee, Vaal Eden community, and the Federation for a Sustainable Environment have resulted in the withdrawal of the application of an amendment of the environmental authorisation and environmental management programme for the Sweet Sensation Sand Mining operation adjacent to the Vaal River.  The EAP was notified by the DMRE that further specialist studies would be required to determine the impact the application for a screening plant and process would have on the environment and that a Regulation 31 amendment process, which involves a public participation process, must be undertaken.  The FSE welcomes the DMRE’s notification. Notification letter attached for download

Pelicam Award for Jozi Gold

The Pelicam Film Festival in Rumania has awarded Jozi Gold a Special Mention.  ...


Mind the Gap consortium launched the new website www.mindthegap.ngo featuring fi...


"Varkies" gou op hok, maar als nie pluis | Beeld

Article also available for download as an attachment.

Radon Alert - Carte Blanche

Millions of South Africans are exposed to radioactive radon gas in their homes and workplaces every day, as the naturally occurring gas escapes through cracks in the earth. The second leading cause of lung cancer in several countries, radon breaks down and when inhaled, decaying atoms emit alpha radiation that can damage the DNA. There are no safe levels of radon concentration. The United States Environmental Protection Agency emphasises any radon exposure has some risk of causing lung cancer. Carte Blanche investigates why South Africa has no regulations to protect against radon accumulation in the home and what you can do to test your home and prevent lung cancer.   Watch the video here.

WITS Economics & Finance Courses: Mining for Development: The Taxation Linkage

Economics & Finance Courses at the University of the Witwatersrand. Mining for Development: The Taxation Linkage - Understand taxation for development and sustainability in mining. View the course here. Enrolment starts on the 7th of October 2019.

Mining activists in SA face death threats, intimidation and harassment - report

SATURDAY STAR | 19 APRIL 2019, 7:41PM | SHEREE BEGA Picture:Yvette Descham On August 13 2013, Billy M heard gunshots at the gate of his house. He didn't know who fired the gun, and, worried that local traditional leadership might be involved, he didn't report the incident to the police. For the next five years, the community activist from Fuleni, a small rural village in KwaZulu-Natal bordering one of SA's oldest and largest wilderness areas, the Hluhluwe iMfolozi Park, continued to receive threats.  "We know our lives are in danger. This is part of the struggle," he says, simply. Billy M's account is contained in a new report released this week, 'We know Our  Lives Are in Danger’: Environment of Fear in South Africa’s Mining-Affected Communities, which documents how community activists in mining areas face harassment, intimidation and violence. The report details how in Billy M's case, mining company Ibutho Coal had applied for rights to develop a coal mine in Fuleni in 2013. The development would have required the relocation of hundreds of people from their homes and farmland and destroy graveyards. "The mine's environmental impact assessment estimated that more than 6000 people living in the Fuleni area would be impacted. Blasting vibration, dust, and floodlights, too, could harm the community," says the report."During the environmental consultation processes, Billy M led opposition that culminated in a protest by community members in April 2016."The company reportedly abandoned the project in 2016 while another firm, Imvukuzane Resources is reportedly interested in mining in the area.The 74-page report, compiled by Human Rights Watch, the Centre for Environmental Rights (CER), groundWork, and Earthjustice, describes a system designed to "deter and penalise" mining opponents.The authors conducted interviews with more than 100 activists, community leaders, environmental groups, lawyers representing activists, police and municipal officials, describing the targeting of community rights defenders in KwaZulu-Natal, Limpopo, Northwest, and Eastern Cape between 2013 and 2018. They report intimidation, violence, damage to property, the use of excessive force during peaceful protests, and arbitrary arrest for their activities in highlighting the negative impacts of mining projects on their communities. "The attacks and harassment have created an atmosphere of fear for community members who mobilise to raise concerns about damage to their livelihoods from the serious environmental and health risks of mining and coal-fired power plants," write the authors."Women often play a leading role in voicing these concerns, making them potential targets for harassment and attacks."But municipalities often impose barriers to protest on organisers that have no legal basis while government officials have failed to adequately investigate allegations of abuse."Some mining companies resort to frivolous lawsuits and social media campaigns to further curb opposition to their projects.  The government has a Constitutional obligation to protect activists," write the authors. Picture: Shayne Robinson, Section 27 Authorities should address the environmental and health concerns related to mining "instead of harassing the activists voicing these concerns,” remarks Matome Kapa, attorney at the CER.The report starts with the high-profile murder of activist Sikhosiphi “Bazooka” Rhadebe, who was killed at his home after receiving anonymous death threats in 2016. Rhadebe was the chairperson of the Amadiba Crisis Committee (ACC), a community-based organisation formed in 2007 to oppose mining activity in Xolobeni in the Eastern Cape.  "Members of his community had been raising concerns that the titanium mine that Australian company Mineral Commodities Ltd proposed to develop on South Africa’s Wild Coast would displace the community and destroy their environment, traditions, and livelihoods. More than three years later, the police have not identified any suspects in his killing."Nonhle Mbuthuma, another Xolobeni community leader and spokesperson of the ACC, has also faced harassment and death threats from unidentified individuals. "I know I am on the hit list.… If I am dying for the truth, then I am dying for a good cause. I am not turning back," she says.But other mining areas have had experiences similar to that of Xolobeni. "While Bazooka’s murder and the threats against Nonhle have received domestic and international attention, many attacks on activists have gone unreported or unnoticed both within and outside the  country."This is, in part, because of "fear of retaliation for speaking out, and because police sometimes do not investigate the attacks", the authors found.The origin of these attacks or threats are often unknown. "So are the perpetrators, but activists believe they may have been facilitated by police, government officials, private security providers, or others apparently acting on behalf of mining companies. "Threats and intimidation by other community members against activists often stem from a belief that activists are preventing or undermining an economically-beneficial mining project. In some cases, government officials or representatives of companies deliberately drive and exploit  these community divisions, seeking to isolate and stigmatize those opposing the mine."The Minerals Council South Africa, which represents 77 mining companies, including some in the research areas, responded that it “is not aware of any threats or attacks against community rights defenders where (its) members operate”.The authors state that while the mining sector and the government emphasise how mining is essential for economic development, "they fail to acknowledge that mining comes at a high environmental and social cost, and often takes place without adequate consultation with,or consent of, local communities".The absence of effective government oversight means that mining activities have harmed the rights of communities across South Africa in various ways. "Such activities have depleted water supplies, polluted the air, soil, and water, and destroyed arable land and ecosystems."Researchers also documented cases of police misconduct, arbitrary arrest, and excessive use of force during protests in mining-affected communities, "which is part of a larger pattern in South Africa".Last year, the Centre for Applied Legal Studies (CALS) at Wits University documented various efforts by traditional authorities to stifle opposition to mines in their communities. "In some cases, traditional authorities label those opposing mines as anti-development and troublemakers, thus alienating and stigmatising them.As a result, community members are often afraid to speak out against a mine in open consultations," CALS found.Research by the SA Human Rights Commission, too, has found that community members sometimes “are afraid to openly oppose the mine for fear of intimidation or unfavourable treatment (by the Traditional Authority)."The SAHRC says many mining-affected communities are experiencing “the creation of tension and division within communities as a result of mining operations.Sometimes, threats and intimidation against activists come from community members who have been promised economic benefit from the proposed project or are politically allied with the government or traditional authority."Local communities often do not benefit from mining activities, says the report. "Although South African law requires the development of social and labour plans (SLPs) that establish binding commitments by mining companies to benefit communities and mine workers, CALS has documented significant flaws in the development and implementation of SLPs."Despite the environmental and social costs of mining, the government is not adequately enforcing relevant environmental standards and mining regulations throughout South Africa. The SAHRC has found that the Department of Mineral Resources (DMR) often fails to hold mining companies accountable, "imposing few or no consequences for unlawful activities and therefore shifting the costs of pollution to local communities."Compliance with regulatory obligations, as well as monitoring and enforcement of such responsibilities, remains a crucial concern in the context of mining activities," says the SAHRC, noting how the DMR and other governmental agencies often do not respond to complaints filed against mines by community members.The report's authors describe how the lack of government action and oversight has also helped make the mining industry one of the least transparent industries in South Africa. Information that communities require to understand the impacts of mines and to hold mining companies accountable for harmful activities is often not publicly available. "Such information includes environmental authorisations, environmental management programs, waste management licences, atmospheric emission licences, mining rights, mining work programmes, social and labour plans, or compliance and enforcement information."The only way to access such information is through a request under South Africa’s access to information law, a procedure that the World Health Organisation has called 'seriously flawed' and which the DMR regularly flouts. In addition, mining companies and the government rarely consult meaningfully with communities during the mining approval process, resulting in uninformed and poor government and industry decisions that do not reflect community perspectives or have their support," says the report.The authors assert how the threats, attacks, and other forms of intimidation against community rights defenders and environmental groups have created an environment of fear "that prevents mining opponents from exercising their rights to freedom of opinion, expression, association, and peaceful assembly, and undermines their ability to defend themselves from the threats of mining".In its November 2018 review of South Africa’s compliance with the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights expressed concern about “reports of human rights defenders, particularly those working to promote and defend the rights under the Covenant in the mining and environmental sectors, being threatened and harassed". It recommended that South Africa provide a safe and favourable environment for the work of human rights defenders to promote and protect economic, social, and cultural rights, including by "ensuring that all reported cases of intimidation, harassment, and violence against human rights defenders are promptly and thoroughly investigated and the perpetrators are brought to justice". Mining activist Mariette Liefferink, who made submissions to the UN committee, tells how it has become increasingly difficult to work as an environmental rights defender in South Africa.   "There is an overwhelming body of evidence of intimidation, whether it is by means of frontal attacks or more insidious attacks on activists."International and South African law requires South Africa to guarantee the rights of all people to life, security, freedoms of opinion, expression, association, and peaceful assembly, and the rights to health and a healthy environment, say the authors."The attacks, threats, and obstacles to peaceful protest described in this report prevent many community activists in South Africa from exercising these rights to oppose or raise concerns about mines, in violation of South Africa’s obligations." 


Development of the National Eutrophication Strategy and Supporting Documents

Attached documents:1. DWS Eutrophication SA & GA PSC 1 BID2. PSC 1 Meeting Agenda - Eutrophication Strategy3. Issues and Response Register - Inception Report Comments

Fears of long term damage to SA's water supply as eutrophication strangles rivers and dams | IOL

Toxic green algae in the Vaal River is caused by eutrophication, which harms wat...